Conor O'Mahony's Database Diary

Your source of IBM database software news (DB2, Informix, Hadoop, & more)

IBM DB2 Strikes Another Blow to Oracle Database

with 6 comments

Those of you who follow DB2, are only too aware that IBM is doing everything in its power to provide the very best value in database software. IBM made a massive investment to develop pureXML—true native XML storage that is clearly superior to the confusing array of XML storage options in Oracle Database. IBM has superior data compression algorithms as well as compression options that Oracle does not offer. DB2 recently added native support for the most commonly used Oracle Database data types, SQL syntax, PL/SQL syntax, and more, making it easy for Oracle Database users to move to DB2. And last year, DB2 added support for a pureScale shared-disk clustering architecture that many argue is better than Oracle RAC. And now IBM strikes another competitive blow to Oracle Database with the exciting new Advanced Enterprise Edition for Linux, Unix, and Windows.

DB2 Advanced Enterprise Edition bundles DB2 Enterprise Server Edition together with:

  • DB2 Storage Optimization feature
  • DB2 Performance Optimization feature
  • DB2 Advanced Access Control feature
  • Optim Database Administrator
  • Optim Development Studio
  • Optim Performance Manager

It also includes limited-use versions of InfoSphere Replication Server and InfoSphere Federation Server.

The list price for the entire bundle is $450 per Processor Value Unit. That works out at a list price of $45,000 for a server with 100 Processor Value Units, compared to $47,500 for a bare bones Oracle Database Enterprise Edition server license. That’s correct. You get DB2 together with all those value-add features and all that additional software for less cost than a bare bones Oracle Database license. When IBM assembled this bundle, we really wanted to make a statement of intent… this is not a standard bundle discount… this is an aggressive move to significantly beat Oracle when it comes to providing value to customers. And don’t forget that the IBM price includes the first year’s support and maintanence. You need to add 22% to the Oracle price for the first year’s support and maintenance.

Here is a table that compares the list price of IBM DB2 Advanced Enterprise Server with the list price of the equivalent Oracle capabilities for a server with 100 processor value units. To be able to compare apples-to-apples, this table also includes the costs for first year support and maintenance.

Functionality DB2 Advanced Ent. Edition Price Equivalent Oracle Software Price
Core Database DB2 Enterprise Server Included Oracle Enterprise Edition $57,950
Data Compression Storage Optimization Included Advanced Compression $14,030
Disaster Recovery HADR Included Active Data Guard $14,030
Advanced Security Adv. Access Control Included Label Security $14,030
Data Partitioning Table Partitioning Included Partitioning $14,030
Administration Optim Database Admin. Included Oracle Enterprise Manager No charge
Development Optim Development Studio Included Internet Dev Suite $7,076
Performance Tuning Optim Performance Manager Included Diagnostics Pack $6,100
Federation Homogeneous Federation Included Oracle-to-Oracle Fed. No charge
Active/Active Rep. Q-Replication with DB2 Included Golden Gate $21,350
Total   $45,000   $148,596

Written by Conor O'Mahony

October 11, 2010 at 11:03 pm

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Hi. Excellent chart to compare DB2 to Oracle. Do you have a comparison between IBM’s vs Oracle’s Replication and CDC technologies?

    Jim

    Jim Smith

    October 22, 2010 at 10:32 am

    • The price comparison depends on the server. To try to account for the different processing power of different types of CPUs, both IBM and Oracle use “processor multipliers” to determine the price. This means that the prices can vary, depending on the processor being used. I can take a couple of examples if you’d like. But please remember that the price difference might vary on other processors. The only way to know for sure is to use the IBM and Oracle pricing information, which is available online.

      For an IBM Power Systems 770 with 4 CPU cores, where I include the first year of maintenance and support so it can be an apples-to-apples comparison:
      IBM InfoSphere CDC: $75,840 (120 PVUs x $158/PVU x 4 cores)
      Oracle Goldengate: $85,400 ((1.0 x $17.5K x 4 cores) * 1.22)

      For a Sun UltraSPARC IV with 4 CPU cores, where I include the first year of maintenance and support:
      IBM InfoSphere CDC: $63,200 (100 PVUs x $158/PVU x 4 cores)
      Oracle Goldengate: $64,050 ((0.75 x $17.5K x 4 cores) * 1.22)

      Conor O'Mahony

      October 22, 2010 at 1:23 pm

      • Hi. you mentioned the pricing (which is fine) but I am looking for information that compares the technology features between Oracle Golden Gate and QReplication. You also mentioned that Oracle had Federation technology, but, does it compares to DB2 EII Federation technology?

        Jim Smith

        October 22, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    • Hi Jim,

      I’ll have to get some help from some of my colleagues at IBM to answer competitive feature/function questions about those products. I’ll ask them to respond directly to this thread…

      Regards,
      Conor.

      Conor O'Mahony

      October 22, 2010 at 4:14 pm

      • Hi Jim,

        QReplication is one of the underlying technologies of InfoSphere Replication Server – similar to Oracle GoldenGate, it’s designed for high throughput, low latency data replication. For a more detailed comparison, would suggest referring to each of the product’s website (InfoSphere Replication Server is at http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/infosphere/replication-server/). I’m not very familiar with Oracle’s federation solution, but it’s important to keep in mind that DB2′s federation technology inherits the bulk of DB2 enterprise’s capabilities – this means that you get all the DB2 benefits of security, availability, parallel processing, auditing, monitoring, and caching with an IBM federation solution.

        Wendy Tam

        October 23, 2010 at 3:42 pm

  2. Wendy,Conor,

    Hi. Thanks for the update on Change Data Capture technology. I am currently using the DB2 Federation (Enterprise Information Integration) technology and very powerful when compared to solutions from companies like SAP/Business Objects (Product: Data Federator), Composite (Product: Composite Suite), Oracle (Product: Aqualogic – via BEA), Ipedo (Product: Ipedo).

    Jim

    Jim Smith

    October 24, 2010 at 8:32 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 65 other followers